.

Off The Hook (Why the All-Volunteer Army is Wrong for America) Part I

In our democracy, the current arrangement of an all volunteer army is not an appropriate instrument for fighting wars of our collective choosing.

In 1999, with war sweeping through the wreckage of what was once Yugoslavia, I bobbled my three-year old son Matthew on my knee as together we watched a television newscast that quite unexpectedly began broadcasting images of a burned-out civilian bus that had been accidentally targeted by a NATO missile. Matthew was too young to be upset by any of this, but I was upset in the way that a new parent is upset whenever certain, harsh realities intrude upon their children. I was still at that early phase of parenthood that had me marveling at the length of Matthew’s eye lashes, the crystal depth of his hazel-brown eyes, and the soft feel of his feet and hands. He was everything lovely and innocent in a child and I just couldn’t square that innocence with the horror unfolding in front of us on that TV screen. What I felt was shame and embarrassment, as if I or my adult world had been found out, and revealed in its immorality and imperfection. And looking at Matthew, I wondered how I could ever “explain” any of this to him.

A few short years later our country found itself involved, yet again, in another war: the conflict in Iraq. As was my habit at the time, I would go at dusk to sit in the wooden stands down in the Arroyo where a cool breeze seemed always to gather no matter how hot the day, and together with several other fathers, watch our sons play baseball. The smiles were always easy, the banter good-natured and generous, the kind of peaceful, small-town ritual that gives small towns and fathers a good name. I don’t think any of us sitting there in that golden light ever imagined that our young boys who were only 9 or 10 at the time could possibly be exposed to the fighting in Iraq, but five or six years later as the conflict dragged on, that notion was no longer an abstraction. I knew at least one, slightly older boy who had joined the National Guard seeking direction and benefits only to find himself facing live-fire in Iraq. And though I never asked, I often wondered, which of those fathers who had watched on countless nights their sons running, throwing and gliding across grassy fields would press for their sons to fight in Iraq? Who among those fathers would not literally move a mountain to keep their sons safe and away from the killing ground of that war?

As an American citizen, I am certainly aware of the point of view that represents war as a regrettable necessity in an imperfect world. I would not argue that the flawed and aggressive history of mankind has not been steeped in war, but I would never celebrate any of the so called virtues of war without first acknowledging that at its core, no matter what the cause or justification, war represents not the greatest test and virtue of mankind, but its greatest failure. That being said, I would also never advocate for the unilateral disarmament of our nation, which must, despite its best inclinations, exist in a world that largely rejects my premise, celebrates military prowess, and tends to war at will.

But there is, at least for me, a rub. If in a democratic society the people, who are not compelled to fight by a dictator or by laws not of their making, embrace war as an acceptable means for the settling of disputes among nations, then those same people cannot in good conscience hold that position without simultaneously and assertively making themselves and their children available to fight. In our democracy the current arrangement of an all-volunteer Army is not an appropriate instrument for fighting wars of our collective choosing. Rather, it is a convenient and immoral act of self-deceit, which enhances rather than deters the possibility of future wars. It does so by placing the vast majority of citizens at a comfortable distance from the bloody effects of the war policies they support. And it does so by undemocratically distributing the pain and suffering of war among a willing, yes, but unacceptably small segment of our society. In the roughly ten years of war in Iraq and Afghanistan, fewer than 1% of the adult population of the United States has participated in the fighting... (to be continued in Part II on Monday.)

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

iamspartacus June 01, 2012 at 11:41 PM
i will see your arnold, lee & ensign...and raise you a Gingrich, North and all in with a Regan
Darien Dom June 02, 2012 at 12:56 AM
Iam - I call your raise and raise you with a DICK Morrris (who seems creepely like Luca).... Fox News contributor and self-described sex addict Dick Morris says he’s looking forward to seeing a “spread in Playboy” featuring the fourth woman to accuse Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain of sexual harassment. Morris told Fox News host Sean Hannity that Sharon Bialek was just looking to make money when she came forward on Monday to explain that Cain had “reached for my genitals” and “grabbed my head and brought it towards his crotch.” “Gloria Allred is in search of headlines and this woman is in search of money,” Morris opined. “This woman has been unemployed for 13 years and this is apparently pay day. She’s not accusing him of harassment, she accusing him of assault. He should go to jail if he did that.” “Certainly if it was true, it would be inappropriate,” Hannity admitted.
Patriot2012 June 02, 2012 at 02:54 AM
Luca must have the late shift at the Taco Shack tonight.
sebastian dangerfield June 02, 2012 at 03:42 PM
spart you have clinton lying under oath, anthony weiner charles rangel- Whats the point? The point is--when someone tries to estabish that there are bad repubicans Ill agree. Why is it so hard to admit that obama has made similar moves to bush, that you all formerly called outrageous? Is that such an issue? Apparently so, since it never occurs. And my take away is as usual--people are on their team. They are not about doing what's right anymore. They are about defending at all costs the actions of their 'guy'. Just to say--if people like you, spart, or Robert or the new Sebastian, (post b.s. veterans service) now posing at Patriot 2012, fee they are 'thinking " individuals--then think. Larry Craig is slime, Bush was not always honest , and neither is Obama. My brain doesnt stop working when Romney speaks about healthcare. I get that he is being duplicitous. But Robert and spartacus somehow feel an obligation to defend or ignore the transgressions that Obama has perpetrated. A dishonest military action in Libya, while watching people slaughtered in Syria, is difficult to defend. SO? Dont defend it. Use your brain. Defending Obama, Robert results in more bad decisions. Your lot refuses to hold him accountable. Not good, if its a better America you wish to see.
iamspartacus June 03, 2012 at 09:09 PM
Dishonest about Libya? Hello do you remember Iraq? Lets see how many Americans died because of Bush and Co. lies about Iraq?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »