Parents Call for Tighter Gun Laws in Tense Hearing

Two sides clashed in Hartford Monday as parents of those lost in the Dec. 14 shooting testified.

Both sides knew it would be a showdown. And it was.

Advocates for and against gun control clashed in Hartford Monday at a public hearing for the Bipartisan Task Force on Gun Violence Prevention and Children's Safety, set up in response to the tragic shooting that took the lives of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in December.

Both sides knew the atmosphere would be tense, and that the Legislative Office Building in Hartford would be packed. Anticipating a huge crowd, police put additional security measures in place, including metal detectors.

And it was tense -- and packed. More than 1,300 people signed up to speak, according to ABC News, with wait times as long as two hours.

One of those speakers was Neil Heslin, father of 6-year-old Jessie Heslin, a shooting victim. Heslin was one of three parents of children lost on Dec. 14 to speak at the hearing, along with Veronique Pozner and Mark Mattioli. He went head-to-head with gun control advocates, according to Fox News, saying he couldn't see a reason for any civilian to own a high-powered assault rifle like an AR-15 or an AK-47.

"The sole purpose of those ... is put a lot of lead out on the battlefield quickly. And that's what they do. And that's what they did at Sandy Hook Elementary on the 14th," said Heslin.

A handful of crowd members shouted back about Second Amendment rights.

Pozner and Mattioli took the discussion deeper, asking questions about civility in today's society and the problem of evil. Pozner, who described her son as a "young philosopher," said she didn't always have the answers to his thoughtful questions, according to ABC.

She said Noah used to ask, "If there are bad guys out there, why can't they just all wake up one day and decide to be good?"

"The problem is a lack of civility," said Mattioli, who also called for stricter enforcement of existing laws, according to the Hartford Courant. "I believe in a few simple gun laws. I think we have more than enough on the books ... We should hold people individually accountable for their actions."

Response from pro-gun advocates was spurred by groups like Newtown-based National Shooting Sports Foundation, one of the largest gun advocacy groups in the U.S. The group was thrown into the spotlight shortly after the December shooting when news organizations like the Huffington Post noticed its coincidental presence in Newtown.

Representatives from the NSSF joined Connecticut-based gun manufacturers, including Colt and Mossberg & Sons, in a press conference in Hartford Monday prior to the start of the hearing.

"We’re here to listen to what the legislature has to say and to work with the legislature, to be at the table to craft a solution," said NSSF Vice President Lawrence Keene at the conference, according to a release from the group's web site.

An widely distributed online action alert encouraging supporters to attend the hearing and sign up to speak bore stronger language, calling potential gun control measures "draconian" and "knee-jerk reaction legislation" that would make Connecticut gun owners "instant criminals."

"Legislators in Hartford are in the process of destroying your Second Amendment rights by exploiting recent tragedies," said the release.

Monday's hearing was the second of four the Task Force is holding. On Wednesday, the legislature will travel to Newtown for the final hearing at Newtown High School.

Abe Froman January 30, 2013 at 10:36 PM
The entire Constitution, not just the 2nd amendment, is written to state what the government cannot do to the citizens of the U.S. (i.e. it shows how the citizens are protected from government, including one that might become tyrannical). Despite your view, nothing has changed since the Constitution was written. We still need protections from an overreaching government and always will.
Abe Froman January 30, 2013 at 10:39 PM
Frederick, thanks for admitting that you know nothing about a topic in which you wish to force changes upon others. It's even more enlightening that you admit that you won't educate yourself. Despite these points, you expect to be taken seriously?
Sandra January 30, 2013 at 10:50 PM
Thank you. It is more fun dueling with you.
Sean O'Donnell January 31, 2013 at 01:03 AM
Blame the LAWMAKERS.
disheartened resident February 04, 2013 at 04:03 AM
"They just care about their rights" Spoken like a true low information voter who likely knows more about "South Park" and the "Mafia Wives" than issues of substance like Constitutional Law and Governmental Boundaries. The one thing that we certainly do agree upon is "It's a shame innocent people have to die like that". Don't think just because we don't want our rights taken away that we don't care. Every firearms owner I have spoken with CARES and is as HEARTBROKEN as everyone else is about this tragedy. We just are opposed to be paying self serving politicians for a crime we didn't commit, with a payment (our rights) that won't prevent future incidents like this from happening! So "Hopeful", better to remain silent and thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »